It is intellectually dishonest to say "some experts are concerned about superintel" - like "some experts don't believe in climate change"https://twitter.com/juliagalef/status/891044838396674048 …
-
Russell wrote top AI textbook & Legg founded top AI company. They're hardly analogous to fringe scientists denying climate change.
2 names out of N is the definition of fringe. A top statistician, RA Fisher, long denied smoking caused cancer. It was still a fringe view.
-
-
Again, it is dangerous & irresponsible to try to pass fringe fear-mongering as mainstream among experts. Intellectual dishonesty
-
In the 1970s, would you have been the one claiming "some top statisticians deny that data shows link between smoking and cancer"?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Legg & Russell are far from the only ones! I just named them as 2 prominent examples. Happy to talk about the % of experts who are worried,
-
but my main beef was that your original claim was factually wrong - you said "no serious experts," and that's just false.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.