If you want to debate AI risk, you don't have to invoke fictive demons. Then again, perhaps the story won't sell as well
There are many AI risks we can be worried about. Security, bias, job replacement, political manipulation - They hardly receive any coverage
-
-
-
And if you want to debate existential threats, you can look at nuclear weapons, antibiotic resistance, climate change...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Don't all of these things get lots of coverage?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well said Francois. Let them debate. Reality doesn't negotiate and neither debate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agree on all except job replacement
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I accept that it is F
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On the same time, we can't even manage to persuade about humans' impact on climate, so good luck with AI :(
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or he could just continue to focus on research and publishing research papers. There are ppl who do that but get zero press covfefe
-
because people are more entertained by the threats which aren't most imminent. ObamaWH published a report on risks.. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/10/12/administrations-report-future-artificial-intelligence …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It was just one example I rembered on the spot which was commissioned for that exact purpose.
-
And not defeatism. Junk science is a hard problem.. esp with influencers like Musk speaking out of their asses. But so is real research.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.