It is intellectually dishonest to say "some experts are concerned about superintel" - like "some experts don't believe in climate change"https://twitter.com/juliagalef/status/891044838396674048 …
-
It's a dangerous myth. You'll always find *some* names. And upon closer look you'll find issues with the meaning of "expert" or "concerned"
Stating "many serious experts" is just not true. You will be hard pressed to find even 3 legit ones. Out of hundreds.
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg et al seem to reach to their conclusion with a strong groundwork. Saying 'it is science fiction' isn't a strong argument.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even so, why use the consensus of researchers who themselves believe human-level AGI is very far off or incoherent?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's hard to explain the difference between an "AI theorist" and an "ML researcher", particularly when one provides much better pull quotes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.