It's a dangerous myth. You'll always find *some* names. And upon closer look you'll find issues with the meaning of "expert" or "concerned"
It is intellectually dishonest to say "some experts are concerned about superintel" - like "some experts don't believe in climate change"https://twitter.com/juliagalef/status/891044838396674048 …
-
-
-
Stating "many serious experts" is just not true. You will be hard pressed to find even 3 legit ones. Out of hundreds.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Your recent article about the limitations of DL would be very good to cool the press, but unfortunately this news is not sexy for the public
-
Hopefully the closer we to AGI the less we will hear about this topic...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
1/2 Dear François, we all respect you for your work but you still do not seem to provide the basis of your argument like 'doomsday preppers'
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Russell wrote top AI textbook & Legg founded top AI company. They're hardly analogous to fringe scientists denying climate change.
-
"No True Scotsman" achievement unlocked
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This must means you defined expert, conducted a poll of them, and found 97%+ agreement... Right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Using climate change analogy to argue future will be fine if we just stop worrying and let industry do its thing... Bold
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here is Peter Norvig's opinion, and he has basically been Switzerland on the issue. You seem to just want the other side look fringe/dumbpic.twitter.com/08eynlcs2R
-
you may be sad to hear, that isn't an actual argument. Can your side produce any evidence that your very bold prediction has any veracity.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.