Every rule can be broken, and you can be successful by "only" following a majority of them -- not any single of them is a requirement
-
-
Replying to @fchollet
But breaking a significant number of rules just makes your life considerably harder. You'll need to compensate with intuition -- genius
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
These rules are kind of an open secret. Easy to find out, yet few seem aware of them. On top of my head, I can list 10 of them for painting
7 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
Everytime I draw something, the response is directly proportional to how many rules I was following. 8/10: great success. 3/10: no one cares
5 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
Follow the rules = redundancy, Break the rules = entropy. According to Cybernetic Aesthetics the sweet spot seems to be around 6.5/10.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @quasimondo
Funnily enough, the ratio between novelty and the expected is part of the rules. The rules are higher-level -- not a formula.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fchollet @quasimondo
and I think the correct ratio is 8/10, or maybe 7 something
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
That 6.5 is approximately the maximum "surprise value" in information theory, according to Helmar Franke.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @quasimondo
My own guess is purely empirical. Also I wouldn't be surprised if the perfect ratio was dependent on the individual, because the ability to
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fchollet @quasimondo
integrate new information given existing data is not a universal constant
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
e.g. smarter people should enjoy a lower ratio...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.