just need a good comment + upvoting system to create checks and balance + give more weight to "verified" commenters no?
Used to think adding comments to Arxiv would be a great avenue to give feedback. Actually, users can never be trusted with a comment button
-
-
-
I actually think NY times/Reader's pick does this quite well
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Commenting works pretty well on bioRxiv. I run a preprint journal club and a few of our reviews improved ms prior to journal submission 1/2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not without some of moderation. With that, though, it can add great value. See also MathOverflow, for instance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Biggest issue is not many people commenting and only a small fraction of papers garnering enough interest for comments. 2/2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Somebody put a "thank you" on one of my arxiv sanity comments once
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sure you've seen: http://www.arxiv-sanity.com/discuss?id=1506.02640 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Given the success of StackOverflow, I think there is much value in allowing users to comment. Only requires careful implementation.
-
Has anybody ever done a survey of which comment systems work well, which don't and why?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The question is: which is better, to avoid negative states, or to take a chance. Same as in RL.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.