There need not be a dichotomy between profits and strong, socialist DK-style state. The higher the profits, the more to be shared. Broadly.
Socialism implies greater responsibility on the part of the state; only works in tiny states like DK. Socialism at scale leads to corruption
-
-
Truth
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
more concentrated power raises probability of corruption. socialism req more power concentrated in government. scale is issue as you said.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What do you mean by “socialism”? Denmark is a capitalist market economy. France by some measures is more socialist than Denmark.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends on the flavour of socialism, IMO. Proudhonian federalist socialism avoids the problem of inefficiency/corruption at scale.
-
At least in theory. Unlike a lot of other flavours, it's not really ever seen the light of day.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can you be more specific? What about socialism in particular is not scalable? Likewise does capitalism not lead to hyper-corruption as well
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think lack of transparency and authority by social proof are bigger contributors to corruption; less to do with scale and choice of "ism".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Works in Germany. Not giant but also not tiny (population and GDP wise). 1/4 pop of US, 4x pop of AUS.
-
Agree with
@amuellerml. Socialism != corruption. Socialism + weak political system leads to corruption. Already working in some large G10.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.