There's no shortage of important and largely untouched problems in AI. We have no energy to waste on complaining about academic trivialities
-
-
Replying to @fchollet
What do you care about most: credit assignment for a finding no one will remember in 5 yrs, or building the most important tech of our time
3 replies 18 retweets 77 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
Put differently: shouldn't the research & publication system prioritize *the speed of progress* rather than I would call "academic drama"?
13 replies 7 retweets 70 likes -
Furthermore there is little cost to flooding the system. Unlike, say, a mathematician who regularly posts proofs eventually shown incorrect.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Jason Baldridge Retweeted Jason Baldridge
It's worth considering whether we, as a community, are doing work that isn't even wrong.https://twitter.com/jasonbaldridge/status/873543431716339712 …
Jason Baldridge added,
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @jasonbaldridge @yoavgo
Looks to me that it is precisely academic drama (e.g. the pursuit of citations & credit taking at all costs) that leads to meaningless work
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
People who post half-baked papers with misleading claims on arxiv to by-pass peer review & be "first" do so because of poor incentives
3 replies 4 retweets 7 likes -
That's definitely part of it. But it could also be they just don't know any better & were in fact proud of it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yoav may not have been diplomatic, but his concern seems to be that leading to echo chamber of poor research that drowns out better work.
3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes
Peer review is not the solution. PR provides very little value (sometimes negative) and is part of the system that encourages flag planting
-
-
That's a strong statement. I agree there are many problems with PR, but it provides quite a bit of value in filtering/improving bad work.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jasonbaldridge @yoavgo
In theory maybe; in practice PR is broken. Consider that the inexperienced people you see on arxiv are the same who will review your paper
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.