This stands in sharp contrast with the current focus of the creative AI community, which is all about jointly generating a grid of pixels.
Humans think in terms of sequences of actions. Arguably the best way to emulate human creative behaviors is by generating data sequentially.
-
-
-
Humans don't know about pixels. They draw one brush stroke at a time, sequentially, incrementally.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I like your statement of humans thinking in sequences. Would you be able to provide some research papers or books on the topic?
-
Look at Jeff Hawkins work at
@Numenta. His book "on intelligence" goes deep on this. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
probably one of the greatest aha moments I/we had in the field when I was an ethnographer studying how people learn is how
-
how we think our processes are so unique at individual scale (heterogenous) but actually ≈ patterned (homogenous) at group/culture scale
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Eye saccades are actually a pretty good example: even perception is sequential, whether it's sight, hearing, or language
-
We don't read word by word or even linearly, but we do read as a sequence of discrete actions where each transition is meaningful
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I agree with
@robinsloan. What about something like Proust's madeleine moment? Associative memory? Dense intuitions or l'esprit de finesse?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I get your point, but arguably any holistic vibe derives its meaning from the narrative around it. Atmosphere in a painting evokes a story.
-
this is not unlike the classic debate among cognitive psychologists around top-down vs bottom-up processing (& role of naming v perception)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.