had a dream where, through a series of internally consistent, utterly convincing logical steps, I was able to prove that I was not dreaming
-
-
That's leaving out the whole component of learning, of education. Of the soul, of the Heart. We can feel things along with know.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like Descartes' way. Pick some axioms that are good for you and follow from there. All that you have are your thoughts. True or fake...
-
This! We are building on an unknown ground. It may sound unwise but that is the only ground we have
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Some ideas to consider in response to your Sellars-ian/Benacerraf-ian doubts: http://www.peneloperush.id.au/proof-Logical-Realism.pdf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We are discriminators. Magician is generator. Eventually we will know something, but inevitably we will know nothing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Solipsism is boring, scientific realism more useful. Per Wittgenstein though, it is often obscured via language...why ontology is hard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would have been pretty cool to disprove Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem in your sleep though!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cogito ergo, sum
-
yea, no. If you like western schools, you have to go before plato/socrates...to the guys they looked up to. Zeno and his Master Parmenides.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.