used to think that ML people didn't know enough math, that this was what was limiting the field. Now I think the field needs more humanities
-
-
Replying to @fchollet
Why we would need more math is clear: the field is largely empirical and mostly free of theoretical foundations (true before DL, worse now)
3 replies 20 retweets 72 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
Opening up a math textbook (e.g. information geometry) at any random page can easily lead to a good and novel ML paper. Math under-exploited
2 replies 22 retweets 80 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
But being better at building solutions is less valuable if you don't pick the right problems to solve and don't apply your solutions wisely
2 replies 52 retweets 141 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
I find the field as it is now ill-equipped to deal with increasingly cult-like influences, & to take on significant social responsibilities
10 replies 37 retweets 142 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
Not just ML, any tech field needs more of the humanities. The essence of the humanities is what truly defines what an "education" is.
1 reply 6 retweets 33 likes -
Replying to @_onionesque @fchollet
An engineering degree is not an edu, it is training. Add to the lack of education good money, and you get a strange kind of individualism.
3 replies 7 retweets 48 likes -
Replying to @_onionesque @fchollet
That's a claim too far for me. It smacks of the snooty "science is vocational training" attitude I've heard often
3 replies 0 retweets 16 likes
Agree; rational thought, the scientific method, and algorithmic thinking are essential cognitive building blocks in a humanist education.
-
-
Yes. A Science education (infact math too) is absolutely essential. They all add synergestically.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Hahaha. Tech training + good money -> libertarianism.
0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.