used to think that ML people didn't know enough math, that this was what was limiting the field. Now I think the field needs more humanities
Why we would need more math is clear: the field is largely empirical and mostly free of theoretical foundations (true before DL, worse now)
-
-
Opening up a math textbook (e.g. information geometry) at any random page can easily lead to a good and novel ML paper. Math under-exploited
-
But being better at building solutions is less valuable if you don't pick the right problems to solve and don't apply your solutions wisely
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
DL is an incredibly good hack, hard to roll back
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Watch "the Crown"; there's an exposition about efficiency and dignity. People will like ML that enhances dignity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.