The most remarkable thing about the brain is that it wasn't designed. As a result, how the brain works is largely an irrelevant question.
-
So what is actually the original point? Having a hard time making much sense of the original tweet + replies
My point is that asking "what problem is the brain solving" is more important than asking "how the details of brain implementation work".
-
-
You can re-read the thread, it is pretty unambiguous and a large majority of people seem to get it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree with that assessment, but it was definitely not unambiguous :) "How" the brain works means many things to neuroscientists
-
...including asking and answering the high-level problem q's (Marr's computational level), and algorithmic and implementation q's
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.