But I do hope that we can use AI to help prevent actual catastrophies.
Actual global catastrophic risks: climate change, antibiotics resistance, nuclear war, the rise of populism. Fictional one: self-aware AI.
-
-
-
It's just as likely AI will be used to generate catastrophes
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nonfictional one: non-self-aware AI.
-
Critical one: not enough intelligence, artificial or natural.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
you are clearly biased if you don't include 'globalism' as a risk
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nothing ever happened until it happened. But fair point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How do you know you aren't a self-aware AI trying to downplay your own risk? Works for extremely human values of self-aware AI.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Talking about self-aware AI is way more fun than the kind of activism and hardwork needed to make a serious impact on the real problems
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tool AIs in the wrong hands are plenty real and dangerous though. Hence
@OpenAI's focus on democratizing. 1/ -
If threat was "summoning the demon" democratizing would be awful. Then the goal would be to minimize AI development wholesale. 2/
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.