ICLR opened up my eyes to the harsh realities of research world. Many papers I thought were quite good getting trashed. Efforts Evaporated.
-
-
Replying to @hardmaru
conf acceptance isn't a sign of quality or even scientific soundness, it's marketing. Accepted papers get more exposure.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
at a low level, the review process can filter out some manifestly terrible papers. Anything above, and it is purely a lottery.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
but do note ICLR has a better process than most. Other confs are more likely to accept v. flawed papers or reject impactful ones.
1:00 PM - 19 Dec 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.