ICLR opened up my eyes to the harsh realities of research world. Many papers I thought were quite good getting trashed. Efforts Evaporated.
conf acceptance isn't a sign of quality or even scientific soundness, it's marketing. Accepted papers get more exposure.
-
-
at a low level, the review process can filter out some manifestly terrible papers. Anything above, and it is purely a lottery.
-
but do note ICLR has a better process than most. Other confs are more likely to accept v. flawed papers or reject impactful ones.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.