people have been asking for that feature since forever. I hope it will happen eventually. I wish arXiv was an open-source project.
-
-
right, because comment sections work so well everywhere else
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @jacobeisenstein @fchollet
hopefully with comments being tied to scientists with reputations to protect, they will not be a pile of shit.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
we will have a whole new set of problems though.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Plenty of historical examples of famous scientists (wrongly) protecting their turf against new ideas
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Open review could lead to good ideas being squelched in addition to bad ones
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
isn't this precisely what peer review w 3 reviewers does? On top of reviewers not actually reading papers.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
in defense of trad peer review: you sample diff set of 3 revs each time, and revs are mostly independent
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
a sample of 3 has huge bias. If it were 100, maybe it would work okay.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
actually easier to get a "controversial" paper in with 3 revs than with 100.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
also much easier to get a significant paper rejected. Happens all the time. Esp. when 2/3 didn't read it.
-
-
sure. and its frustrating. but you do inf number of chances, so in expectation it will get in.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
if one famous rev doesn't like it in open review, your long term chances are much smaller.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.