right, because comment sections work so well everywhere else
-
but you still to a large extent judge what to read now and what later based on reputation.
intellectual prejudice might delay the rise of an idea but not stop it. NNs used to face massive prejudice
-
-
agree big picture but no consolation for folks w/careers riding on paper count in publish/perish
-
once "How many NIPS papers do you have?" Is no longer a hiring criterion, I say go full open
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
was it indeed *pre*judice?
-
more spec: many say NN tech didn't change much, but data & compute made old stuff work... so?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.