Peer review: a ton of scientists commenting on this paper in the past few days. Conference/journal peer review is closed and often terrible.https://twitter.com/berty38/status/799691999141974016 …
a sample of 3 has huge bias. If it were 100, maybe it would work okay.
-
-
actually easier to get a "controversial" paper in with 3 revs than with 100.
-
also much easier to get a significant paper rejected. Happens all the time. Esp. when 2/3 didn't read it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.