would be nice if the comments were attached to the arxiv paper somehow though.
-
-
Replying to @yoavgo
people have been asking for that feature since forever. I hope it will happen eventually. I wish arXiv was an open-source project.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
right, because comment sections work so well everywhere else
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @jacobeisenstein @fchollet
hopefully with comments being tied to scientists with reputations to protect, they will not be a pile of shit.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
we will have a whole new set of problems though.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Plenty of historical examples of famous scientists (wrongly) protecting their turf against new ideas
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Open review could lead to good ideas being squelched in addition to bad ones
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
isn't this precisely what peer review w 3 reviewers does? On top of reviewers not actually reading papers.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
in defense of trad peer review: you sample diff set of 3 revs each time, and revs are mostly independent
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
so hard for one famous person to squelch the idea. this will indeed be a problem with open review.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
the ultimate test of ideas is not peer review, it is reproducibility. So open ideas are un-squelchable.
-
-
but you still to a large extent judge what to read now and what later based on reputation.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
intellectual prejudice might delay the rise of an idea but not stop it. NNs used to face massive prejudice
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.