http://openreview.net down again. next year they should just use GitHub for paper submissions, or better yet, use http://gitxiv.com
-
the benefit of a github submission is that optional supplemental materials like data, code, results, video+audio can be uploaded.
could create a repo + Github bot: PRs contains author information, bot automerges submission PRs, allows edit PRs from authors.
-
-
A "submission" would be a new folder created in the repo with an AUTHORS.txt, a pdf / tex, possible code or anything else.
-
If the supervisor bot is well programmed, no human intervention necessary. Question: how would anonymous reviews work?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wouldn't it be easier if authors just submitted the PR on github. Then PR only gets merged if the paper gets accepted?
-
hard to review a paper as PR, much better to merge it first.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
there are already journals managed on github: http://rescience.github.io
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.