As a result it has become broken and irrelevant in many ways. We need an open alternative that's actually focused on science and education.
I feel like most of the system we call "academia" isn't built to advance science, but to sustain the ego of its members.
-
-
-
read an article a few days ago and it really made me think http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/ees.2016.0223 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
(so is twitter btw)
-
You mean that Twitter pretends to have a monopoly on science? Or that a few popular tweeters decide who gets to become a Twitter member?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
life goal: be as smart as the guys that profit on the referred ego :Dpic.twitter.com/OyzDpp2AaB
-
"tired of getting your arXiv paper hidden on the firehose? Worry not, we will get the attention your paper deserve for 999.99$"
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
True. Most Universities are becoming research institutions that promote minimum publishable units into a broken peer review system
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
can we disrupt academia by forming our new world of self sustaining, theory agnostic science and engineering? Yes, startups + VCs.
-
just different power structures. Egos of investors just as critiquable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Welcome to adulthood.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.