I see many people incredulous when "my loss is increasing, but accuracy is going up". What matters is the distribution of per-sample losses.
-
-
Replying to @fchollet
Would a per-sample loss histogram be more useful than a lumped sum then? It should be a trivial change with current tooling.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @lemonzi
if you can interpret it, maybe.
2:12 PM - 13 Oct 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.