Not overlooked in any sense (see e.g. @OpenAI). But yes, an important and positive changehttps://twitter.com/dennybritz/status/778252018964045824 …
-
-
Replying to @j_gauthier
Well, OpenAI publishes code (like everyone), but so far they act like a regular research lab that works in secret.
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @dennybritz @j_gauthier
what do you mean re secret? We have a list of major projects, and also special projects, etc...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jackclarkSF
Sure but the work is not completely transparent, you can’t follow progress and what’s being worked on on github for example.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dennybritz @jackclarkSF
when I say open I mean totally open to everyone and collaborative
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @dennybritz @jackclarkSF
closed power structures + private funding make it similar to a regular research institute. Need an open successor.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
the essence of a research organization is communication, which comes for free, or nearly. No need for large funding
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I believe the wikipedia model (new and revamped), with distributed control + donations for funding, should work.
-
-
Replying to @fchollet @jackclarkSF
that and focusing on easy collaboration and getting up to speed for new researchers who want to contribute
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.