About SARM. At this point I am 100% convinced that the VGG16 experiment is not for real. Most likely a big experimental mistake, not fraud.
Epilogue: the manuscript was withdrawn by the first author. It looks like it may have been deliberate fraud.https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04062
-
-
Wow. Looks like you called it (not fraud specifically, but invalidity of the results)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hope this doesn't sour people off energy & data efficient learning. Need for it in order that ML not concentrate on elite servers.
-
And you know, genuine learning online instead of the instinct crystallized systems of today.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What changed your initial opinion from mistake to fraud? I just can't imagine what benefit fraud would bring ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.