About SARM. At this point I am 100% convinced that the VGG16 experiment is not for real. Most likely a big experimental mistake, not fraud.
-
I tried some cheating setting and got results similar to that claimed in the paper.Really worried that this is a sign of big fraud
what's your implementation? What's the "cheating settings"?
-
-
I already post on reddit: sampling the best 10% training data based on the error on validation set. Really a shame on ML community
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The community should push the author to release the code soon and reveal the experimental settings. It is really a big issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.