About SARM. At this point I am 100% convinced that the VGG16 experiment is not for real. Most likely a big experimental mistake, not fraud.
PCANet does it differently. PCANet was unconvincing, but had accordingly poor results.
-
-
which is great, I should mention. We need more papers that try unconventional ideas, obtain poor results, and talk about it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
hard to understand what innocent experimental "mistake" could explain their results?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.