Unsure what to think about Stacked Regression Machines http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04062 Did anyone repro, try on more datasets?
-
-
Replying to @fchollet
Just noticed: "arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1404.3606 by other authors" Doesn't bode so well...
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
it'd be useful if they highlighted the text that overlaps
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @latentjasper @fchollet
Indeed, though upon a quick scan I see no block quotes, so it doesn't look good.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dwf @latentjasper
that paper is the central reference in the newer paper, so it doesn't look fishy to me. What I'm waiting for is repro.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @fchollet @latentjasper
It's still unattributed text, a serious academic no-no.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
My point is not that it is itself a smoking gun but decreases my trust, as it suggests carelessness at best.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dwf @latentjasper
main thing that decreases my trust is that the paper fails to assert the implications of its own results. Also no code
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
should be a much bolder paper, with proper evidence backing it (code, more benchmarks)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.