why?
-
-
Forget arxiv for a moment. What if it was a tech report from a lab.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
arxiv and technical report are equivalent in my world
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
In my world, too. If there is a tech report, that is similar (and by diff. authors), that should be cited.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@jacobeisenstein maybe a good criteria is number of other cites to that tech report / arxiv paper.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoavgo @ani_nenkova and
Our team has had several arxiv papers cited long before the conference submission.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chris_brockett @yoavgo and
same, and if one knows about good related work on arXiv, one should cite it +
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jacobeisenstein @chris_brockett and
+ but that's different from saying authors are *responsible* to know about every arXiv and TR
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jacobeisenstein @chris_brockett and
how do you know if the authors knew the work or not when they submitted?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoavgo @jacobeisenstein and
I expect people to keep up with arxiv, same as I expect them to keep up with ICML/NIPS
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
tough. Arxiv has new papers every day.
-
-
I think atm its still reasonable. Someday it may not be and I'll reconsider.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.