When people are saying "robots will take our jobs! We're doomed!", they're implying "productivity gains will make us poorer!"
-
quite an an extraordinary claim, since basic economics preclude this from happening (unless in a monopoly situation).
But I fail to see the extraordinary evidence required to back it. A cursory glance at the methodology shows that
-
-
both productivity and "real wages" metrics used are completely flawed
-
I’d love to see better metrics of either one.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.