When people are saying "robots will take our jobs! We're doomed!", they're implying "productivity gains will make us poorer!"
-
-
Humans are bad at judging in absolute terms. The feeling is that they're being screwed more than before. http://www.epi.org/publication/ib330-productivity-vs-compensation/ …
-
Unfortunately, they're right about that—which makes the absolute gains highly questionable at the very least.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
it’s happening fast, we’ll have to adapt fast, entire classes of job may disappear, last 30 years productivity gain benefited 1%
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michiexile IS it absurd? Automation promised us reduction of human labor. Instead, we saw reduction of single-income households. -
I don’t see it as much as absurd, as I see a **glaring** indication that our current distributional politics is doomed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well... in the long run everyone is better off. But take the Luddites: They were worse off for generations. Individuals lost out.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's the transition that's scary, not the final outcome. If tech displaces 5 mil workers in 10 years, what happens to them?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And is it Pareto-optimal, I.e are they no worse off? Or are the jobs they can get less desirable/compensated? Over how long?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People who are unable or unwilling to learn new skills are the ones that suffer from technological progress.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.