"artificial intelligence" is a poorly defined thing, to which many people attribute wildly unrealistic abilities. It's a recipe for trouble.
-
Part of the problem is that some companies & journalists are hyping it up, blurring the line between sci-fi and reality. Because it sells.
When you talk about "AI", *define* what you are talking about. Make explicit what it can do, and what it can't do. Avoid brain analogies.
-
-
next you'll have us just call it matrix multiplication and vector processing.
-
Part of issue is that "AI" has been historically misused. Is constraint-satisfaction an "AI" method for example?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
As
@ylecun said once in a interview: "there is a huge amount of hype in this area"@fchollet@OkbaLeftHandedThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
explicitly what it can't do is most important imo. the hype machine needs hard boundaries.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
or just don't. I find the term
#AI as disturbing as#CongnitiveComputing.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
AI= faking intelligence with statistics ... For a long time I was puzzled why I don't like AI, it's empirism/inductivism
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jpatanooga but then it's way harder to ride ambiguous marketing hype.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.