A maximally efficient communication protocol would look like random noise, out of context (besides error correction mechanisms).
-
-
-
Replying to @yoavgo
it shouldn't. The point is that it could, and it would still serve the same purpose.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
... maybe I'm being slow, but how should acknowledgement of this fact about efficient communication protocols affect NLP?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jacobeisenstein @yoavgo
you can't understand language without considering it in context: agents communicating about something.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Yes I think this is pretty widely accepted in NLP, see e.g. work from Roth, Mooney, Zettlemoyer, Barzilay, etc +
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @jacobeisenstein @yoavgo
I can't remember a single NLP paper that included the concept of agent or environment.
5 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
here's a random example, would this count? http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1687892 …
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @jacobeisenstein @yoavgo
good to know that some people are following this direction. I'm mostly exposed to the DL side of NLP.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @fchollet @jacobeisenstein
oh, you mean the part of NLP practiced by those who don't know NLP but believe they can solve it in few years?
3 replies 5 retweets 35 likes
don't worry, deep nets will also solve art, music, etc. We'll just add more layers.
-
-
irony has been detected in this tweet :)
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.