All NLP is about mapping the internal statistical dependencies of language, missing the point that language is a *communication protocol*.
-
-
Replying to @fchollet
You cannot study language without considering *agents* communicating *about something*.
2 replies 7 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
The only reason language even has any statistical dependencies to study is because it's imperfect.
2 replies 4 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
A maximally efficient communication protocol would look like random noise, out of context (besides error correction mechanisms).
5 replies 5 retweets 8 likes -
-
Replying to @yoavgo
it shouldn't. The point is that it could, and it would still serve the same purpose.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
... maybe I'm being slow, but how should acknowledgement of this fact about efficient communication protocols affect NLP?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jacobeisenstein @yoavgo
you can't understand language without considering it in context: agents communicating about something.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Yes I think this is pretty widely accepted in NLP, see e.g. work from Roth, Mooney, Zettlemoyer, Barzilay, etc +
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @jacobeisenstein @yoavgo
I can't remember a single NLP paper that included the concept of agent or environment.
5 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
well, actually I can remember one, but it was extremely fringe (getting agents to invent their own language)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.