Posit: if you believe in a hoax despite lack of evidence, you are less likely to believe in something supported by overwhelming evidence.
-
-
Replying to @fchollet
e.g. if you believe in chemtrails, you are less likely to believe in climate change. The latent variable being a lack of critical thinking.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
Case in point: HN's gwern publicly supported the hoax about CW being Satoshi. But when the real one was revealed with overwhelming evidence,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
gwern was the conspiracy theorist attacking the evidence with very weak arguments. Ironic!
8:00 AM - 5 May 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.