Posit: if you believe in a hoax despite lack of evidence, you are less likely to believe in something supported by overwhelming evidence.
e.g. if you believe in chemtrails, you are less likely to believe in climate change. The latent variable being a lack of critical thinking.
-
-
Case in point: HN's gwern publicly supported the hoax about CW being Satoshi. But when the real one was revealed with overwhelming evidence,
-
gwern was the conspiracy theorist attacking the evidence with very weak arguments. Ironic!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.