@fchollet I use the cite link from google scholar
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@fchollet perhaps some clever citation network visualization?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@fchollet scrapping Google Scholar?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@fchollet I suggest https://www.semanticscholar.org/ - provides excerpts from the papers that are cited / cite it and order by influence or recency. -
@fchollet i.e. for a paper that cites Bahdanau et al's "Neural Machine Translation"... https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Neural-Machine-Translation-by-Jointly-Learning-to-Bahdanau-Cho/0c3dc2d0145e0ee5e640ed8347d30db8844f6ec5?citingPapersSort=is-influential&citedPapersSort=is-influential …pic.twitter.com/ioxozLHR7N
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@fchollet I think Google scholar does that?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@fchollet Not sure if its the "best" way, but I find the MS academic search to be useful. https://academic.microsoft.com/ -
@random_samples@fchollet Not sure if this was a "complement", but we found it to be comforting. Let us know what features you like to see! - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@fchollet if you (or your work) has a subscription then http://www.webofknowledge.com is very good for that. Google scholar is also good.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.