In summary: mimicry is not understanding. Understanding comes from experience. First, we need to create machines that can experience.
-
@fchollet Absolutely not, I'm afraid, but it's a very common misunderstanding. Even his position "biological naturalism" may sound like it.
@Pawelotti when pressed about it, Searle says that consciousness is a not-yet-understood biological phenomenon --i.e. he's a dualist
-
-
@fchollet Ah, okay. There's you're really wrong, I think. The paper snippet is clear as day. He is trying to get at mimicry vs experience.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.