@fchollet I'm pretty sure this is exactly what he'd agree with and the Chinese Room aligns with that.
In summary: mimicry is not understanding. Understanding comes from experience. First, we need to create machines that can experience.
-
-
-
@Pawelotti I'm pretty sure Searle is doing semantic plays to "convince" us that biological systems are conscious while silicon can never be. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@fchollet You could recast it as him saying that extremely well performing mimicry would still not be understanding, thought..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@fchollet ..for indeed experience is needed. He is also clearly not a carbon chauvinist.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.