The lower down the stack a technology is, the more important it is that its interface be highly stable (so as not to invalidate all the layers built on top whenever things change) and its behaviors simple and consistent (so as not to create leaky abstractions).
-
Show this thread
-
A foundational technology should do as little as possible, but in the most general way possible.
2 replies 5 retweets 48 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @fchollet
what are some good examples of this in your opinion? This was how I felt about LISP when I learned it at Uni & while there’s trade-offs, it helped me gain a more intuitive understanding of how to think about each layer of abstraction & the interfaces between them
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @netcapgirl @fchollet
my first thought was BSD unix but I didn’t know if it fit the paradigm
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @netcapgirl
All of these are good examples I'd say!
12:21 PM - 13 Oct 2021
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.