Rather a lot of people in tech wonder if crypto, or large parts of it, is an emperor with no clothes and don’t want to say so publicly. That’s not to say that it is, but there is a real reluctance to be publicly skeptical regardless of private sentiment.
-
-
I have been continually arguing that crypto is not another internet. I agree with that. But there's a wide spectrum between the CA Gold Rush and the South Seas Bubble that it exists somewhere within.
-
The primary valuable use case from crypto at this point is that it's aggregated a bunch of money (or expectations of money) into a somewhat closed ecosystem and this wealth(?) is funding some stuff that wouldn't get funded otherwise. Sadly, most of it is bad art at this point.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Basically, judge new technology by what it enables you to *do*, and how that changes the game, not by who uses it or what for. That's how I judge crypto. That's how I know it's BS. It's *not* the torrent of scams.https://twitter.com/fchollet/status/1429211618559205379 …
-
Looking through my history it seems I've been repeating the same thing many times (and it wasn't even about crypto)https://twitter.com/fchollet/status/965391195059888129 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Perhaps the early 90s internet is a better example. I think a lot about open source too. That was going to destroy Microsoft.
-
I think the comparison to the internet is strained for the reason
@fchollet cites: it was obviously useful and enabled new things. At the moment, I find more interesting interrogations to not be technical: like the gold rush or south seas. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.