Talking about affordances is the only valid way to describe a new technology or product. The hallmark of meaningless vaporware is that it gets described via technical jargon with no mention of what you can concretely *do* with it.
-
-
Show this thread
-
To evaluate a tech announcement, ask yourself: 1. What can you do with this thing? 2. Are these capabilities new? 3. How do the new capabilities change the game? Do not ask: 1. Does it seem cool? 2. Does the tech seem complex / advanced? 3. Who's making it?
Show this thread -
Technology is not fashion, and it would be a serious mistake to treat it as such.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
How is this related to the original thread?
End of conversation
-
-
-
Sounds like Keras to me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the audience also makes a difference. Steve Jobs was a smart person to know that too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Masterclass in story telling.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I always remember that Xbox conference... "What can you do with this? Watch TV. TV, TV. "
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@readwiseio save thread -
First public save of this thread!
Readwise users: Like this reply to save fchollet's thread to your account without cluttering their replies
Stats:
• 61 total saves of fchollet's threads (ranked #437)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.