Some money can help to fluidate the progress, too much money consolidate. No money just desert the research.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not entirely related but reminds me of this:https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/gartner-hype-cycle …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
actually, open source infrastructure says no, but you work at google where the internal infrastructure is a selling point for recruitment, so it makes sense that you would be unable to perceive of any alternative
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Today's post by
@paulkrugman covers this topic for solar and wind as case examplesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nope ... randomness has huge impact . Maniac, Fraunhofer, Galois
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To develop a todo list and task management app yes. For advanced technologies, recruiting talents is the bottleneck, not money. What to do with more money? Recruiting unfit people or paying double the already well-paid engineers may give a worse result.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like all the technology that people get mad they didn't think of it first.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But X billion dollars in one field maybe a significant investment while just a drop in ocean for the other. The same goes with iteration cycles. Consider image recognition and space exploration as examples.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It depends on breakthroughs too. And breakthroughs are not predictable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
