You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Unless you're coding with a Nokia 3310 keyboard, that is. In that case, do what you must.
And yes, obviously, using i as index in a loop or using the abbreviation num_* is completely fine. The question is not "is the variable name a full word", it's "is it understandable by everyone reading the code". In m cs s var nm ct b intp. Please use common sense.
I feel like idx works better than i if it's actually a list index! I still use i, but only for anonymous iterations where it only represents a range.
Gonna start using this, thanks!
I'm using "for token_i, token in enumerate(sequence)" as an example. The additional information is really helpful, especially when dealing with nested for-loops. – Even naming standards can be made more explicit, without breaking learned patterns.
undrstndabl and not anoyying
Once I had to deal with FORTRAN code without IMPLICIT NONE. I think we have made great strides in readability in the last few decades.
In case anyone had trouble parsing that last part: "In many cases short variable names can't be interpreted".
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
