Most people I meet overestimate what deep learning can do (it's curve-fitting, don't expect it to do discrete symbol manipulation, it will solve symbolic tasks via embedding + interpolation) and simultaneously underestimate what you can do with curve-fitting given enough data
-
-
"Meh, it's just a factory, boring... but look at my cool model rocket!" No, the boring factory is going to change the face of the world, and meanwhile your GPT model rocket won't scale past the toy stage
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not a steampunk believer I see
That said yes, a lot of it seems to be connected to problems not really being filtered that way on whether deep learning should be applied due to its performance on certain seemingly similar tasks.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't know about airplanes or rockets but they did manage to pull off steam-powered submarines and may I say they did spectacularly wellhttps://youtu.be/IZS0RpOgdfQ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True ☑︎ We are often deluded by taking moonshots when in fact we need to be working on things that move the needle
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.