This is also how babies learn, of course: the first step towards performing an advanced interaction with a thing is to perform a much simpler (potentially very different) interaction with the thing, not to master the first part of the complex interaction
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"The best first step" needs a scientifical proof.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Any methodology to set up/define the boundary between the basic and complex end to end system?
-
Isn't that called requirements engineering?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Indeed, Gall’s Law!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Obviously… Now I should search for the corresponding PR from OpenAI or Facebook But I've better things to do… Take care
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a lesson I learned building MMOs & marketplaces - and I teach this to all my clients & students. Some get it... some struggle.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It always feels like the basic system is overwhelmingly difficult to build, which is why we default to sticking to just one part and stay comfortable
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Completely agree. I think that is something we should strive for. Understand and build a 2-yr child intelligence first rather than complete human intelligence.
-
I remember a NeurIps workshop where this was exactly proposed : “Towards Dog level AI “
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.