You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I know there are people out there who actually refuse to cite certain methods/results they build upon, or the software they use, because it didn't appear in a journal or conference. This is the exact opposite of scholarship.https://twitter.com/Michael_J_Black/status/1407974010789449728 …
It's like refusing to honor an invoice because it was printed in blue ink instead of black ink. If you used it, or if you think your readers should know about it, cite it. Whether it's a talk or an ArXiv paper or a blog post or a GitHub repo.
Definitely, Though while it might be a minor point, maybe some of them might have been trained this way? In certain other fields, there used to be journals that wouldn't accept the submission that was citing anything from those sources. Just speculation though.
I don’t understand this. I thought it was clear if you use it you must cite as academic dishonesty otherwise. But the policy gives ACs and rebuttal a reprieve from related work out on arXiv close to the deadline or poor unpublished work.
I’ve had reimbursements denied because they were written with red ink. In 2020!
I worked at a company where programmers had to fill in our hours in red ink.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
