Sometimes people say, "X is technologically feasible (with deep learning), but it would require a dataset much larger than what we can collect". A more accurate take is we don't have the technology to do X given a realistically-sized dataset.
-
-
Yes, it's hiding an exponential.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And few features, k-NN is crazy sensitive to the curse of dimensionality
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
data generation using monte carlo or any other method (markdown tools for nlp for instance) is not the best way though for most of the real life problems
End of conversation
-
-
-
Not to mention the robustness which has not hit the KPIs yet! Most trained models change by adding/removing data, or skewing data.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Give me a dataset large enough and some more to cross validate on, and I will move the Earth 2% farther than the current SOTA (by burning off excess rainforest mass)” —Archimuskes
-
Earth mover‘s distance?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Reminded me of Archimedes quotes but for data “Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Correct
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what about svm? do people use svm nowadays?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.