The central question in AI is -- can we make a machine that's capable of doing things we didn't program it to do? It's reminiscent of alchemical transmutation -- something out of nothing. A system that's fundamentally more than what went into it.
-
-
Would if be safe to assume our programming arose iteratively? The blueprint scattered across the evolution of organism complexity?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rule 110 is capable of universal computation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
creating interesting patterns is not intelligence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't a deep neural network itself a good example of a complex system that its collective behavior is more than and smarter than the behavior of individual neurons?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Like u mentioned, value/use is subjective. I have once used “cellular automaton” approach to simulate fluid dynamics, and the pattern it generated (or predictions if you will) often surprised and exceeeded what you expect from the basic rules you put in.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
or is intelligence having some ability to abstract similarities between different contexts And trying out methods which work in one situation, in another scenario?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Will and representation, it's all it takes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Consciousness will be the key. The bad thing is, we barely understand it and I think we put way too less effort in research about it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.