I am reaching a little bit but why not? @fchollet I am reading your paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547 (for the 3rd time I think) why is it that generalization has necessarily a cost that makes it antagonistic to compression in the Occam's Razor sense? @RobertTLange?
-
-
Such notes would have been very compressed, obviously: they'd have much less info than the original movie. But they'd have a lot more info than the shortest possible form of the notes that could answer the original questions. These notes would be *generalizable notes*.
-
So generalization involves *some* compression (a lot of it actually) but also a lot of work that's opposite to compression (writing down seemingly useless info that seems interesting / salient).
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ok I love the example because I have always been a horrible note taker. But here, ( and I am afraid I might be confusing things) I feel like my ability to write the best notes about the questions would come from a powerful "compressed?" representation of the movie. Or no?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I guess if I can only use the notes it makes perfect sense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.